BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
I just caught this one on Encore the other day. To say that it's leisurely paced would be an understatement. Despite that, the film is intriguing for not only the cast, Mark Damon, Eduard Franz,...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
It doesn't seem likely he would have used the same appliances, since appliances don't last very long. Also, he would have had to make a cast of Mark Damon's face for the appliance to fit properly. As...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
>>the beast/Mark Damon>> Interesting casting in light of the fact that Damon had previously ghost-directed LA BELLE ET LA BETTE (Cocteau was forever grateful).
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
Bill, you may remember that Pierce was never comfortable with the positive/negative face casting and foam rubber appliance method used by his successors at Universal. His methods were cotton and...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
Quote:The appliance may not have been the one used on Chaney, but it is of the same design and maybe out of the same generic mold. No question about that; Pierce came up with the design for WEREWOLF...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
See Mark Damon/Pit and the Pendulum thread in the DVD folder for an explanation. If that doesn't suffice, make an appointment with Damon's dentist brother for further details along with a teeth...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
Hi allI'm watching Cahn's BEAUTY AND THE BEAST, and want to ask to all movie buffs if anybody can recognize this secundary actor in the movie:He appeared in the minute 15'15" and to me, he seems a...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
If you're talking about the guy on the left, he's an actor named Herman Rudin -- I usually see him in gangster-type stuff, THE UNTOUCHABLES and shows like that. A strange-lookin' dude. Very effective...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
Thanks, Tom... when this kind of doubts begins to assailt our minds, nothing like an authority opinion.Best regards
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
Rapfred wrote: Interesting casting in light of the fact that Damon had previously ghost-directed LA BELLE ET LA BETTE (Cocteau was forever grateful). I don't know if Damon actually said this (in fact...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
Rapfred wrote: >>the beast/Mark Damon>>Interesting casting in light of the fact that Damon had previously ghost-directed LA BELLE ET LA BETTE (Cocteau was forever grateful). Zut alors!...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
<< I seem to remember Damon claiming that he ghost directed HOUSE OF USHER for Corman. << No, PIT AND THE PENDULUM. So I subsequently asked a few actors if they even remembered Damon on...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
I saw this flick a few years back and I am very puzzled by it. I mean … why did this get produced? I assume it was due to the fact that there was a sufficiently large "kiddie show" market at the time....
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
opticalguy wrote: I saw this flick a few years back and I am very puzzled by it. I mean … why did this get produced? I assume it was due to the fact that there was a sufficiently large "kiddie show"...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
BEAUTY AND THE BEAST was indeed an Edward Small production; the earliest press announcements called it his "follow-up to JACK THE GIANT KILLER." At first Small was going to make it under his personal...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
That wolfman got some extreme Michael Landon hair goin' on.
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
Saw the last hour of B&tB '62 on THIStv. It reminded me weirdly enough of some of the costume dramas of the era, with Corman "Poe film" lighting. Joyce Taylor was quite the good-girl minx, and I...
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
The best print of ATLANTIS,THE LOST CONTINENT is the Warner Archives MOD disc, because it presents the film letterboxed for the first time.
View ArticleRe: BEAUTY AND THE BEAST (1962)
horrorfilmx wrote:opticalguy wrote: I saw this flick a few years back and I am very puzzled by it. I mean … why did this get produced? I assume it was due to the fact that there was a sufficiently...
View Article
